May
06

Inside The Numbers Week 12: Bonus Points

By Hamish McBrearty

This week Inside The Numbers takes a look at the bonus points system and how alternate proposals would affect the table as it currently stands. Steve Tew, CEO of NZRU, was asked about the bonus points system in a radio interview last week. “The table would look a lot different this year if we didn’t have them,” was his response, but crunching the numbers has led me to a different conclusion.

First, here’s the table as it stands.

Hurricanes 39
Chiefs 37
Bulls 37
Sharks 35
Waratahs 32
Crusaders 32
Brumbies 32
Blues 31
Force 29
Highlanders 23
Stormers 19
Lions 19
Reds 18
Cheetahs 12

Now here’s the table with no bonus points

Hurricanes 32
Bulls 32
Sharks 32
Chiefs 28
Waratahs 28
Brumbies 28
Crusaders 26
Force 22
Blues 20
Highlanders 16
Stormers 12
Lions 12
Reds 12
Cheetahs 8

Spot the difference? There isn’t much of one. The top four remain the top four, the bottom five remain the bottom five and those in the middle only move up or down one place. Even the Blues with their massive 11 bonus points taken away only drop a single place.

But what if we took away those nabby pamby bonus points for losing by less than seven points. Surely these politically correct, reward teams for almost winning points are an abomination and need to go. That will shake the table up!

Hurricanes 37
Bulls 35
Sharks 34
Chiefs 33
Brumbies 32
Waratahs 30
Crusaders 28
Blues 28
Force 26
Highlanders 19
Lions 16
Reds 15
Stormers 13
Cheetahs 9

Would you look at that? The only effect it has on the table is the Brumbies leap up two places into fifth and push the teams ahead of them down one place. This is due to the fact the Brumbies haven’t scored a single close loss bonus point, but other than that the table remains unchanged.

Perhaps we should adopt a more radical approach. Radio Sport’s Nigel Yalden proposed that we do away with bonus points entirely, instead giving teams two points for a home win, three points for a road win and a point for a draw. Yalden added the caveat that this can only work in Super 15 when teams will play seven home and seven road games. Here’s what this table would look like:

Sharks 20
Hurricanes 19
Bulls 19
Chiefs 18
Waratahs 17
Brumbies 17
Crusaders 16
Force 13
Blues 12
Highlanders 8
Stormers 7
Lions 7
Reds 7
Cheetahs 4

Wow! Even the radical rethinking has little effect on the table. Again the top four remain the top four, the bottom five remain the bottom five and those in the middle move up or down a single spot.

It would seem no matter how many points are given to teams for wins and whether a league awards bonus points for scoring more tries or suffering a close loss, the table doesn’t actually change that much. Largely because the most important thing in sports is winning. If a team racks up enough wins, they move up the table, not enough, they move down.

And at the end of the day, the points system is there to sort out who are the top four teams that will play in the semi finals. In the case of all four systems here, it’s the same teams who occupy those spots.

Finally, here’s all four tables side by side for comparison:

Actual
Hurricanes 39
Chiefs 37
Bulls 37
Sharks 35
Waratahs 32
Crusaders 32
Brumbies 32
Blues 31
Force 29
Highlanders 23
Stormers 19
Lions 19
Reds 18
Cheetahs 12
No Bonus Points
Hurricanes 32
Bulls 32
Sharks 32
Chiefs 28
Waratahs 28
Brumbies 28
Crusaders 26
Force 22
Blues 20
Highlanders 16
Stormers 12
Lions 12
Reds 12
Cheetahs 8
No losing bonus points
Hurricanes 37
Bulls 35
Sharks 34
Chiefs 33
Brumbies 32
Waratahs 30
Crusaders 28
Blues 28
Force 26
Highlanders 19
Lions 16
Reds 15
Stormers 13
Cheetahs 9
Yalden proposal
Sharks 20
Hurricanes 19
Bulls 19
Chiefs 18
Waratahs 17
Brumbies 17
Crusaders 16
Force 13
Blues 12
Highlanders 8
Stormers 7
Lions 7
Reds 7
Cheetahs 4

Similar Posts:

Bookmark and Share
Creative Commons License
The Inside The Numbers Week 12: Bonus Points by Hamish McBrearty, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Leave a Comment