Archive for May, 2009
Power Rankings: The road to the semis
Posted by: | CommentsWith just one round remaining there are seven teams still in the hunt for just four semi final spots. Applying Sports After Dark’s two ranking formulas reveals who is going to fight another day, and who will be planning for 2010 this time next week.
Here’s how I’m predicting the table to look, without any bonus points, next Monday:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Sharks, who just two weeks ago were predicted to be in the semis, have now been supplanted by the Crusaders and look set to miss out after dropping three of their last four games. Even a bonus point win over the Bulls may not be enough to make the semi finals if other results do not go their way.
This year’s title race could be decided by bonus points, although the current top four do have their own destinies in hand. Bonus point wins to the Crusaders and Hurricanes, which are very achievable, will see them secure their semi final places, while the Chiefs and Bulls can make the semi finals even if they lose their finals game, but that would require other results to go in their favour.
The other thing that I find interesting is this is the first time all season that both ranking models have agreed on all seven results.
Power Rankings: SAD v HoS The Final Showdown
Posted by: | CommentsWith just one week to go in the round robin of Super 14 and it’s time for to once again compare my rankings to those publish by the Herald on Sunday. Once again, I may have to cut the Herald some slack due to publishing deadlines, it’s entirely possible this column was published before the last three games of the round from South Africa. Then again, I suppose that’s one of the disadvantages of traditional media.
|
Sports After Dark
|
Power Ranking
|
Herald on Sunday
|
|
Chiefs
|
66.38
|
Chiefs
|
|
Hurricanes
|
66.25
|
Sharks
|
|
Bulls
|
65.28
|
Hurricanes
|
|
Sharks
|
57.94
|
Bulls
|
|
Waratahs
|
55.72
|
Crusaders
|
|
Crusaders
|
54.46
|
Brumbies
|
|
Brumbies
|
52.73
|
Waratahs
|
|
Force
|
49.5
|
Force
|
|
Blues
|
36.02
|
Lions
|
|
Highlanders
|
35.1
|
Blues
|
|
Stormers
|
34.25
|
Stormers
|
|
Lions
|
19.63
|
Highlanders
|
|
Reds
|
13.83
|
Reds
|
|
Cheetahs
|
11.03
|
Cheetahs
|
Strangely we agree on the top four, although not in the same order. However, I question the ranking of the Sharks at two, this is a team who seem to be fading fast with just one win from their last four outings and face the table topping Bulls in what is a virtual quarter final in the last week of the round robin. I tend to think fourth, which is where I have them, is a much better spot.
Other than the Sharks, it’s hard to argue with any of the other rankings, but we’ve both had 13 weeks and 84 games to figure it out. Glad to see we both got there in the end.
Crusaders keep their playoff hopes alive with win over the Reds
Posted by: | CommentsThe Crusaders kept their chances of making the semi finals alive with a 32 – 12 win over the Reds at AMI Stadium on Friday night.
Needing a win and a bonus point to keep their semi final hope alive, the Crusaders needed to throw everything at the struggling Reds. Conditions were wet and slippery after 12 hours of rain, which fortunately let up before kick off time.
The Crusaders forward pack, faced with the conditions and inexperienced opponents, dove into the trenches and dominated the breakdown area and tight exchanges. After some early attempts at back line moves, the Crusaders forwards began to attack in close to the ruck and found a great deal of success here.
After an early penalty by Leon MacDonald, the Crusaders forwards marched down the centre of the field, staying close to the ruck in a sequence that was finished off when Thomas Waldrom crashed over. The home side continued their domination in the tight exchanges, but allowed a number of chances to go to waste, either through handling errors or ill-advised kicks.
Playing what could be his last game on AMI Stadium, Leon MacDonald was at his best, regularly eluding the first tackler, providing punch when he came into the back line and providing staunch defence. Perhaps it was then fitting that he was named man of the match for the second game in a row.
Isaac Ross played a magnificent game, often running well with the ball in hand and showed deft hands for a tight forward. Ross was the creator for the Crusaders’ second try, throwing a brilliant cut out pass which allowed prop Owen Franks to go over in the corner for his first Super 14 try.
The wheels truly came off for the Reds after 33 minutes when a Crusader break was snuffed out by illegal play from Quade Cooper who was shown a yellow card, leaving the inexperienced Reds backline without their pivot man.
While the Reds were a man down the Crusaders scored one try to Tim Bateman and could well have had another on the stroke of half time, but for yet another handling error.
The bonus point was secured for the home side just after half time thanks to Jason MacDonald who popped up on the right flank, and showed a sidestep that most wingers would have been proud of.
With the bonus point secure the Crusaders eased off a little, not really allowing the Reds into the game, but not threatening their line either. The Crusaders added one more try to replacement Sean Maitland, while the Reds were able to pick up two consolation tries in the final ten minutes to Ben Tapui and Greg Holmes.
This win propels the Crusaders into the top four for now, and another win next week against the Blues could well see them make the semi finals.
Power Rankings: Who will make the top four?
Posted by: | CommentsLast week I published an article containing how my two ranking models were predicting who would make the semi finals. The answer was resoundingly the Hurricanes, Bulls and Chiefs, with either the Sharks or Force rounding out the top four. Another week has gone by, the models have been fed more data and with just two weeks to go, here’s how they are predicting the table to finish.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Both tables are now virtually identical, with the only result the models disagree on being the Brumbies v Blues game this weekend. As neither of the models takes bonus points into account, there could be a little shuffling, but given their various runs home, I am now officially endorsing the top four predicted by these models as the way the Super 14 will finish. That sees the Bulls facing the Chiefs in Pretoria and the Hurricanes facing the Crusaders in Wellington as your semi finalist.
Inside The Numbers Week 12: Bonus Points
Posted by: | CommentsThis week Inside The Numbers takes a look at the bonus points system and how alternate proposals would affect the table as it currently stands. Steve Tew, CEO of NZRU, was asked about the bonus points system in a radio interview last week. “The table would look a lot different this year if we didn’t have them,” was his response, but crunching the numbers has led me to a different conclusion.
First, here’s the table as it stands.
| Hurricanes | 39 |
| Chiefs | 37 |
| Bulls | 37 |
| Sharks | 35 |
| Waratahs | 32 |
| Crusaders | 32 |
| Brumbies | 32 |
| Blues | 31 |
| Force | 29 |
| Highlanders | 23 |
| Stormers | 19 |
| Lions | 19 |
| Reds | 18 |
| Cheetahs | 12 |
Now here’s the table with no bonus points
| Hurricanes | 32 |
| Bulls | 32 |
| Sharks | 32 |
| Chiefs | 28 |
| Waratahs | 28 |
| Brumbies | 28 |
| Crusaders | 26 |
| Force | 22 |
| Blues | 20 |
| Highlanders | 16 |
| Stormers | 12 |
| Lions | 12 |
| Reds | 12 |
| Cheetahs | 8 |
Spot the difference? There isn’t much of one. The top four remain the top four, the bottom five remain the bottom five and those in the middle only move up or down one place. Even the Blues with their massive 11 bonus points taken away only drop a single place.
But what if we took away those nabby pamby bonus points for losing by less than seven points. Surely these politically correct, reward teams for almost winning points are an abomination and need to go. That will shake the table up!
| Hurricanes | 37 |
| Bulls | 35 |
| Sharks | 34 |
| Chiefs | 33 |
| Brumbies | 32 |
| Waratahs | 30 |
| Crusaders | 28 |
| Blues | 28 |
| Force | 26 |
| Highlanders | 19 |
| Lions | 16 |
| Reds | 15 |
| Stormers | 13 |
| Cheetahs | 9 |
Would you look at that? The only effect it has on the table is the Brumbies leap up two places into fifth and push the teams ahead of them down one place. This is due to the fact the Brumbies haven’t scored a single close loss bonus point, but other than that the table remains unchanged.
Perhaps we should adopt a more radical approach. Radio Sport’s Nigel Yalden proposed that we do away with bonus points entirely, instead giving teams two points for a home win, three points for a road win and a point for a draw. Yalden added the caveat that this can only work in Super 15 when teams will play seven home and seven road games. Here’s what this table would look like:
| Sharks | 20 |
| Hurricanes | 19 |
| Bulls | 19 |
| Chiefs | 18 |
| Waratahs | 17 |
| Brumbies | 17 |
| Crusaders | 16 |
| Force | 13 |
| Blues | 12 |
| Highlanders | 8 |
| Stormers | 7 |
| Lions | 7 |
| Reds | 7 |
| Cheetahs | 4 |
Wow! Even the radical rethinking has little effect on the table. Again the top four remain the top four, the bottom five remain the bottom five and those in the middle move up or down a single spot.
It would seem no matter how many points are given to teams for wins and whether a league awards bonus points for scoring more tries or suffering a close loss, the table doesn’t actually change that much. Largely because the most important thing in sports is winning. If a team racks up enough wins, they move up the table, not enough, they move down.
And at the end of the day, the points system is there to sort out who are the top four teams that will play in the semi finals. In the case of all four systems here, it’s the same teams who occupy those spots.
Finally, here’s all four tables side by side for comparison:
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


