Archive for June, 2009

After hearing Springbok coach Peter de Villiers’s comments about the Schalk Burger eye gouging incident I am now completely convinced that de Villiers is a dickhead. Springbok coach and dickhead

The incident has completely overshadowed what was a magnificent test and when fans should be talking about how it was the most exciting game of rugby played this year, instead we are comparing bans for similar offenses and discussing de Villiers’s moronic comments.

First of all I want to look at how the officials handled it, as they have come under a bit of fire. Assistant referee Bryce Lawrence spotted the offense after just 32 seconds and correctly put his flag out and reported the incident to referee Christophe Berdos. Language difficulties meant Berdos, whose English is sub par to be refereeing at this level, was originally going to award only a penalty against Berger. Lawrence then informed him that this sort of offense warrants “at least a yellow card.”

This sort of thing from an assistant referee annoys me because he’s really wimping out, Lawrence doesn’t want to make the decision for Berdos but at the same time is trying to guide him to the right decision. Secondly officials seem to have an aversion to dishing out a red card early in games as it essentially ends the contest but sometimes this is the right thing to do. This is why I like guys like George Ayoub, they aren’t afraid to make the decisions.

Now on to de Villier’s dickheadedness. After the game de Villiers told reporters that he didn’t think it should have been a card at all. Rugby’s three greatest sins are boots to an opponent’s head, biting and gouging, even if unintentional these are all severely frowned upon and to suggest that Burger should have been allowed to remain on the field is lunacy of the highest level.

After watching the footage again de Villiers changed his tune slightly, claiming that Burger didn’t do it on purpose and that he is “an honourable man”. Looking at the footage as a neutral I think you’d have to be pretty one eyed to think Burger didn’t do what he did on purpose, but then again look at what his coach is saying.

De Villiers went even further trying to claim that the Lions were somehow soft or that foul play was somehow part of the game. “It is a contact sport and so is dancing. Guys who can’t take it, let’s go to the nearest ballet shop and get some tutus”, De Villiers said.

Finally, to complete the utterly psychotic circle, de Villiers has issued a joint press statement with SARU president Oregan Hoskins saying, “We would like to apologise to the rugby community for the erroneous impression that acts of foul play are in any way condoned by South African rugby. That has never been the case and is not now, and we support strong action by rugby authorities when such acts occur.”

Really? Because the pathetic eight week ban is a slap on the wrist over what should be a very serious charge. Just for comparison, Italian captain Sergio Parisse was also given an eight week ban at the weekend for eye gouging, but in his case the citing commissioner accepted his defense that it was accidental, Burger’s case had no such mitigating factors.

Before the tour potential Lion’s flanker Alan Quinlan received a 12 week ban for eye gouging, while Fijian winger Seru Rabeni, who plays for Gloucester, received 14 weeks for the same offense. In fact, according to the IRB regulations, the recommended minimum sanction for “contact with the eye or eye area” is 12 weeks.

So it seems we have a perfect storm of incompetence all around, officials getting it wrong on the field, judical officer give an absurdly light punishment, and a coach defending the indefensible.

But perhaps I should leave the final word to Sir Clive “I sucked all the fun out of the last Lion’s tour” Woodward who said, “Eye gouging is usually picked up by the camera. If a referee or touch judge sees an eye gouging incident, you’ve got to go straight off the field, just a red card.” He then couldn’t resist bringing up old ghosts, “In my last tour we lost O’Driscoll after one minute and you should have had the same situation of losing a top player here.”

Categories : South Africa, opinion, rugby
Comments (0)
Jun
26

NZRU needs to get real

Posted by: Hamish McBrearty | Comments (1)

In the build up to the one off test with Italy in Christchurch this Saturday there has been a great deal of discussion over the perceived “poor” ticket sales for the game, with NZRU CEO Steve Tew going so far as to claim that this threatens Christchurch’s test status for the future.

But this sort of sabre rattling from NZRU headquarters is actually extremely unhelpful as there are a number of very good reasons why Christchurch fans are staying away in their droves. Firstly there’s the reconstruction of AMI Stadium which currently has a half built stand on one side of the ground. Throughout the Super 14 and even during the summer’s cricket matches there has been a lack of atmosphere in the ground, largely because one side is completely open.

But the most compelling argument heard from most people is the quality of the opposition. Why should the rugby public pay full price for a game between the world’s number 1 ranked team and a team ranked number 12? And all the while the NZRU are exporting our biggest rivalry, with Australia, to exotic locations like Hong Kong, Tokyo and Denver.

Christchurch can lay claim to being poorly treated by the NZRU, having not hosted a Tri-Nations game since 2007 when the Springboks played here and have missed out on Bledisloe Cup games since 2006. Instead we have been served a sub standard England team with a side of Italy and we’re supposed to be grateful for this according to the NZRU’s verbal slap down.

Tew is known for having excellent business sense but in what business do you blame your customers when they are no longer interested in your product? Can you imagine the meetings? “Our customers not longer find our product interesting, entertaining or compelling which is clearly all their fault.”

Quite frankly the arrogance coming out of the NZRU is one of the factors which is turning off the New Zealand rugby public and it’s something that needs to be addressed. Take a look at the recent survey of rugby fans and perhaps listen to what they have to say.

The rugby public are turned off by the constant turnover of players, the recent inept performances and these rubbish incoming tests in June with substandard opponents. Quite frankly, rugby in New Zealand is in need of a serious overhaul and right now the people at the NZRU are not the people to do it.

Categories : All Blacks, opinion, rugby
Comments (1)

So the French have done it again. In what was supposed to be a simple warm up game for the Tri-Nations, and let’s face it the French have not sent a full strength team down under for a long time, the unthinkable has happened again and the All Blacks lost.

Now there is the usual public wailing and gnashing of teeth, as well as the coaching staff coming under intense scrutiny. This is not helped by the whispers going around that the coaching staff were to be reappointed through until the 2011 Rugby World Cup.

But with an injury list a mile long, is it time to panic just yet? Losing senior players like Richie McCaw, Ali Williams, Rodney So’oialo and Sitavini Sivivatu leaves the team in a bit of a hole for leadership. Throw in the absence of game breakers Dan Carter, Conrad Smith and Richard Kahui and it’s not exactly surprising to see the team struggle across the park.

There are a number of issues facing the 2009 incarnation of the All Blacks, but the most pressing one can be summed up in three words: lack of depth.

We’ve known for a number of years that our stocks at first five and openside flanker, two key positions, have been quite weak with those stuck behind incumbents Dan Carter and Richie McCaw leaving for overseas contracts and this was shown up once again on Saturday night.

Adam Thompson, while a fantastic player in his own right, is not an international opensiders, being consistently beaten to the breakdown by his French opposite. In fact, those playing close attention at home will have notice the entire All Black loose forward trio that played on Saturday are specialist blindsiders.

Then we have the debacle that is first five. Stephen Donald showed once again that he just isn’t up to the job at the international level even after a stellar Super 14 season. His hurried understudy, Luke McAlister, looked very much like a player who hasn’t played in three months and one wonders about the wisdom of bringing him straight into the All Blacks without a game since April.

Perhaps it could be argued that the coaching staff is doing the best they can with limited resources, and this certainly seems like a sound argument. But those resources are the same ones who will be playing the rest of the Iveco series against France and Italy, and that could prove a bigger challenge than it looks on paper.

Comments (0)

First of all, apologies for the recent lack of updates. My old laptop died on me a couple of weeks ago and I’ve only just got a replacement. Unfortunately I haven’t gotten around to restoring all my stats packages so I won’t be able to do an end of season analysis of the numbers from the Super 14.

Right, on to the topic at hand. Listening to Doug Golightly this morning where I heard the suggestion that should Sonny Bill Williams perform well for the Barbarians against the Wallabies, he should be brought into an Air New Zealand Cup team and fast tracked into the All Blacks for the end of year tour.

On the surface this might seem like a sensible suggestion but I remain unconvinced. I haven’t seen any of Sonny Bill’s games for Toulon since he changed codes, but he is a tremendously skilled player and could well be a star in the All Blacks, should he adapt.

But are we really crying out for another centre? Sure there are some short term injury worries right now with Richard Kahui out for six months and Conrad Smith struggling with a hamstring injury, but in the long term there are plenty of options in the mid field without taking a punt on an unproven league convert.

Even if Kahui and Smith are unable to make the Tri Nations squad, the solution is already presented by slotting the returning Luke MacAlister into 12 and moving Ma’a Nonu out to 13. Don’t forget there’s also Isea Toeava waiting in the wings too.

Some talkback callers also questioned Sonny Bill’s commitment, given the way he walked out on his Bulldogs’ contract. Personally I think walking out was a dumb move, but given the right environment, he could well mature mentally and emotionally to the point where he could easily slot into the All Blacks.

Perhaps Sonny Bill’s path to the All Blacks needs to go through Christchurch. If he is truly serious about playing for the All Blacks, then perhaps the NZRU should sign him to the Crusaders for the 2010 Super 14. Why the Crusaders? Firstly with the loss of Casey Laulala they are in need of a good centre, but the biggest reason is that the Crusaders’ culture places the team ahead of the individual, something I think Williams would benefit from.

I would love to see Sonny Bill in the All Blacks one day, perhaps even by the 2011 World Cup, but he doesn’t need to be fast tracked. He needs time to adapt to the new game and time to mature. Let him continue to play in Toulon but at the very least make him play the 2011 Super 15 season before bringing him up to the All Blacks. Centre is not a position where we need to fast track players, what we need are first fives like MacAlister and openside flankers to back up Richie McCaw. Now where’s Marty Holah’s number?

Comments (0)