Archive for opinion
Inside The Numbers: Do cheaters prosper?
Posted by: | CommentsIn a show of blogging solidarity, I’m going in to bat for Matt over at Green And Gold Rugby for his latest piece pointing out issues around the All Blacks’ tactics. Now while you can question Matt’s motives, you cannot question his point: the All Blacks are the most penalised team in this year’s Tri-Nations and have received the fewest yellow cards.
Matt has come under attack from Herald on Sunday editor Paul Lewis, which he expertly rebuffs as well as Sky Sports Bevan Sanson who attempts to counter Matt’s argument, only to further prove it.
As Matt points out, the All Blacks are the most penalised team in this year’s Tri-Nations, having picked up a total of 56 penalties in five games. By contrast the Aussies have 23 from three games and South Africa 34 from four games.
When turned into a penalties per game stat the reading is not pretty for All Black fans.
| Games | Penalties | PPG | |
| New Zealand | 5 | 56 | 11.2 |
| South Africa | 4 | 34 | 8.5 |
| Australia | 3 | 23 | 7.6 |
As you can see, the All Blacks concede almost three more penalties per game that the Boks and just under 3.5 more than the Wallabies.
The historical stats are not much better. Here’s the same table dating back to 2008.
| Games | Penalties | PPG | |
| New Zealand | 17 | 193 | 11.4 |
| South Africa | 16 | 163 | 10.1 |
| Australia | 15 | 138 | 9.2 |
So both the Wallabies and Springboks are giving away far fewer penalties than their historical averages, while the All Blacks are about the same. The other interesting note is that over this same period both the Boks and Wallabies have received seven yellow cards, while the All Blacks have just four, but this is one instance where the numbers do not tell the full story, context really matters so I’m setting that issue aside for now.
To claim that the All Blacks “get away” with more because they are playing so well right now flies in the face of reality. Sanson claimed that, “They are also smarter, enabling them to “bend” the rules to their advantage,” which is a nonsense.
As Matt rightly points out, the All Blacks seem prepared to give away as many penalties as they need to, keeping their line intact as penalty goals cannot beat tries. The fact that the All Blacks have given away more penalties than their opponents in every single one of their outings seems to confirm this.
Some of us in the New Zealand media need to face up to the facts that the All Blacks are not perfect and no matter how well they are playing, they should never be immune to criticism. Currently their tactics seem to be a little cynical, and I applaud guys like Matt for pointing this out.
Never dismiss well thought out criticism as whinging, even if it is from an England based Aussie.
Referee consistency under the microscope
Posted by: | CommentsWe’ve all heard Springbok coach Peter de Villiers’s crazy theories about some refereeing conspiracy against his team, but I disagree. From what I’ve seen so far this international season, the referees have been consistent. Consistently bad that is.
Looking at this from a slightly All Blacks centric view point, as those are the only games I’ve watched every minute of, let’s go back to the beginning of the international season where the All Blacks took on Ireland in New Plymouth. Unfortunately it’s very difficult to comment on Wayne Barnes’ performance as the game was over as a contest at the 14 minute mark when Barnes quite rightly sent off Jamie Heslop for two attempted knees to the head of an opponent.
Games where the result is in no doubt are easy from a technical refereeing stand point, decision making is not so crucial, but man management is as these games can easily descend into brawls. Barnes did a good job in this respect, but I’m reserving judgement on his overall performance due to the nature of the game.
Next came the two tests against Wales, controlled by South Africans Mark Lawrence and Jonathan Kaplan. Nothing really leaps out in my mind about these performances, so they can’t have been particularly noteworthy. I’m sure if I sat down and watched these games again I could nit pick some incidents, but it’s the overall picture I’m looking at here.
Moving on to the highlight of the international season for the Southern Hemisphere, the Tri-Nations. The 2010 edition kicked off in Auckland where the All Blacks took on the Springboks in a game controlled by Irishman Alan Lewis.
Lewis’s biggest issue in this game, aside form missing Bakkies Botha’s headbutt, was his fitness. In an up tempo game where the All Blacks ran the Boks ragged, Lewis was notably slow in the final quater of the game. Positioning is 90% of refereeing, if you’re not in position you can’t make the right decisions. Lewis often wasn’t prompting All Blacks assistant coach Wayne Smith to offer some simple advice: “Get fitter.”
A week later fellow Irishman Alain Rolland took charge as the All Blacks again faced the Springboks in Wellington. Rolland will be remembered for two incidents in that game, the first when he yellow carded Danie Rossouw for no more than a nudge with his boot on McCaw, and secondly for not yellow carding McCaw after he gave away no fewer four penalties at the breakdown.
George Clancy, another Irishman, did not exactly cover himself in glory, turning in a somewhat mediocre performance when the Boks played the Wallabies, handing out a couple of soft-ish yellow cards for ‘tip tackles’ although it is hard to hold that against referees when everyone knows this focus comes from much higher up the food chain.
The first Bledisloe Cup test between Australia and New Zealand followed on and was adequately controlled by Craig Joubert. I applauded his fortitude in showing Drew Mitchell a red card for his second yellow card offense, but on repeat viewing of Mitchell’s first offense, as reported by assistant referee Cobus Wessels, think Mitchell was a little hard done by. In the context of the game I can certainly understand Wessels’ actions, but it did detract from what could have been an excellent game.
Interesting note here, every Tri-Nations game up to this point included at least one yellow card.
Finally we come to the most recent Tri-Nations game, between New Zealand and Australia again, this time controlled by Jonathan Kaplan. Kaplan is a hands-off sort of referee, often preferring to let minor infringements slide when they have little or no impact on the game, in refereeing circles this is referred to as “material effect”. However Kaplan allowed both teams to effectively slow each other’s ball down at the breakdown, something the All Blacks were more adept at doing than the Wallabies, leading to a somewhat uneventful second half.
Perhaps Kaplan’s biggest failing was not yellow carding All Black prop Tony Woodcock for a nasty off the ball hit on Wallaby hooker Saia Faingaa. The footage of this incident should be replayed to referees at all levels with a banner reading “this is what yellow cards were invented for” flashing on the screen.
Whether IRB referee boss Paddy O’Brien will take action against Kaplan, as he did after Wessels’ performance, remains to be seen but based on past experience I doubt anything will happen. Usually when we hear about “accountability” among referees it means dropping the inexperienced guy for an error but ignoring the errors from the more established guys.
An obvious example of this was the standing down of assistant referee Josh Noonan in round one of the Super 14 this year when he mistakenly flagged the ball as being in touch when it wasn’t. While Noonan was roundly criticized for this, little was said about Stu Dickinson mistakenly awarding a fair catch when a player dropped the ball in the same round.
Now you may have noticed something of a pattern in these errors I’ve highlighted, they all seem to favour the All Blacks. Others have noticed this too and try to invent reasons for these patterns such as bias from the referees, or some global conspiracy to drum up support for the Rugby World Cup next year. To that I say: Hanlon’s Razor, the Law of Large Numbers and the 2007 Rugby World Cup quarter final.
Winners and losers from Bledisloe II
Posted by: | CommentsWith the Bledisloe Cup safe for another year after the All Blacks beat the Wallabies by 20-10 on Saturday night. A number of players reinforced their positions in their squads, while others will have some soul searching to do if they are to retain their places.
WINNERS
Richie McCaw. The All Black captain showed once again that’s he’s the best in his position, claiming a number of turnovers at the breakdown and acting as a link man when running with the ball out wide. Sure he gave away a couple of penalties but that’s in the job description for a good opensider.
David Pocock. A shining beacon in a Wallabies pack which was totally dominated, Pocock showed that he could one day be a player of Richie McCaw’s level. Pocock claimed a number of crucial turnovers at the breakdown and never gave up, toiling tirelessly up against the more powerful All Black pack.
Mils Muliaina. Some have suggested that Muliaina is too old and too slow for international rugby, but on Saturday night he proved the detractors wrong. Steady and safe at the back, as we’ve come to expect, he also sparked a number of counterattacks from the back and even picked up a try with some wonderful work down a narrow blindside.
LOSERS
Tony Woodcock. How Woodcock has escaped being cited so far for his cheap shot on Saia Faingaa is beyond me. It was cheap, it was calculated and it was exactly the kind of Bakkies Botha-like thuggery which has no place on the rugby field. Sure it wasn’t worthy of a red card, or a lengthy suspension, but when compared with Quade Cooper or Jacques Fourie’s suspensions, it does make a mockery of the citing system.
Matt Giteau. Pointing the finger at Will Genia for the Wallabies’ impotent backline is missing the true cause of their problems. Too often Genia was ready to deliver from the base of the ruck, but Giteau was either out of position or still marshalling the troops. Unlike his opposite, Giteau seems to be little threat with the ball in hand and is unable to freeze defenders like he used to. For the Wallabies, the end of Quade Cooper’s suspension cannot come quickly enough.
Richard Brown. Completely missing in action, both at the breakdown and with the ball in hand, Brown surely is not the answer for the Wallabies at 8. Even with a scrum going backwards, a number eight should be able to generate some go-forward, Brown provided none. As the Wallabies move forward to their tour of South Africa, Brown needs to either greatly improve his play or be discarded.
Rattue shows once again, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about
Posted by: | CommentsNew Zealand Herald columnist Chris Rattue has posted his weekly rant on sport, this time focusing on the refereeing of the first Bledisloe Cup test and once again shows he’s either completely ignorant of the laws of the game, or a professional troll. I suspect it’s the former.
Within the first paragraph, Rattue makes reference to the clip being on YouTube as fans were not shown the incident during the live broadcast but then fail to provide a link to said clip. Bad online journalism there, if you’re going to reference a source of material, at the very least link to it.
Here’s the clip
As you can see, Drew Mitchell hits Richie McCaw without the ball and was flagged for this by assistant referee Jonothan Kaplan who then recommended a yellow card. Rattue takes issue with this, labeling it “soft” and claiming that “rugby is stark raving bonkers to send blokes off in test matches for such innocuous incidents.”
But let’s take a closer look and examine the basis of Kaplan’s recommendation: the laws of the game. Clearly the tackle is off the ball which falls under law 10.4 (e): A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously.
Alright, under that law Kaplan was right to flag Mitchell but if that was his only offense then surely a penalty would have sufficed. However watch Mitchell’s arms, he extends them out in a pushing motion, at no time does he attempt to wrap up or grasp McCaw. Is this a legal tackling technique?
Law 10.4 (g) states: A player must not charge or knock down an opponent carrying the ball without trying to grasp that player. The last three words are the key here. While Kaplan’s wording when reporting the incident, “late and no arms” may seem wrong to the casual observer, under the laws of the game he is correct as he is stating the tackle was late, which is was, and the tackler did not use his arms legally.
Many referees use a “double whammy” standard where if a player commits two penalty offenses at the same time, then a yellow card will result. For example a late shoulder charge or an intentional knock on while standing offside. This seems to be an accepted refereeing standard to apply at all levels.
Rattue then goes on to focus on the second yellow picked up by Mitchell.
Mitchell perhaps got what he deserved – under the dubious current rules – when he prevented Conrad Smith from taking a quick lineout throw later on and was red-carded for a second yellow card offence.
The Wallabies knew both teams were on a final warning for obstruction, and rugby is wise to stamp out sneaky delaying tactics.
Looking at the forest rather than the trees, though, Mitchell’s sending off was a nonsense.
Here’s where I utterly disagree with Rattue. Having dished out a warning for delaying the play, referee Joubert was left with no option but to yellow card the next player who did it, and to give Mitchell a free pass because he was already on a yellow card would be nonsense.
Watch a football game where a player gets yellow carded, he will tone down his play and try to avoid situations where another yellow is possible, Mitchell did quite the opposite of this and put himself in a situation where a second yellow was a near certainty.
The red card is, I believe, not used often enough in rugby because from that point on the game is over as a contest. 14 men simply cannot beat 15, and for that reason referees are loathe to use it, in fact not a single player was red carded during this year’s Super 14.
But in situations where the referee is left with little choice, such as Joubert was with Mitchell and Wayne Barnes was with Jamie Heslop, we as fans need to support the referees and realize that they are only reacting to what the players have done. There was a chain of events which led to Mitchell’s dismissal, all of which were in the players’ hands.
Finally there’s something of a hot button issue I want to comment on. The IRB is trying to eliminate shoulder charges and tip tackles from the game entirely. This is why referees seem to be so harsh on these, it’s not a case of sanitising the game, it’s a case of trying to make the game safer for all players. I personally know of two amateur referees who had their playing careers ended by tip tackles.
Once players realize that these two types of foul play will not be tolerated by referees or judicial panels, they will become a rarity on the field and we will have a safer game at all levels. Until then referees will continue to be put in a difficult situations and clueless columnists will have fodder for their ill-informed rants.
Does rugby need two referees?
Posted by: | CommentsAfter a lacklustre performance from Irish referee Alan Lewis, All Black coach Graham Henry has once again floated the suggestion of bringing in a second referee to help control the game. “I’ve made the suggestion a couple of times about having two refs — not at the same time, but the second ref replaces the first at an appropriate period in the game. It might be after 50-55 minutes. So you have two quality refs who can keep up with the play,” Henry said.
Now Henry’s suggestion is more sensible than having two referees controlling the game, which has been trialled, but also leads to difficulties for the referee. For a start, context is a very important part of refereeing and most times you can only get that context from being out in the middle, even if a second referee were watching the game before taking control, he would not have a full contextual understanding of everything that went on out on the field.
Of course referees need to warm up and do their own mental preparation before taking the field, which means the second referee would not be able to watch all of the game anyway. Then we most likely find ourselves in a situation where all prior warnings to players get reset, and players will try taking liberties with the laws again.
The other obvious problem with this proposal is the rapport with players, as one player from one team may get in the doghouse with the referee then gets that reset when the second referee takes the field. Referees are, of course, human and emotion does play a part in refereeing when it shouldn’t. Look at Steve Walsh vs Steven Hoilles for a good example of this.
Speaking of Walsh and his run in with Hoilles, Walsh actually said that rugby was becoming too complex for one referee and that a second was needed after that particular game. Plenty of other sports use two referees to control their game, even rugby league has successfully implemented this system, but is it right for rugby union?
One of the things that sports who use two referees need to establish is a clear separation of responsibilities. In rugby league the second, or pocket, referee watches for any illegalities in the ruck and alerts the main referee as he does not have the power to blow his whistle, while in ice hockey one referee will move down to the goal line, following the puck while the other watches for infraction away from the puck.
Can rugby do this same thing? Would one referee watch the tackle/ruck/maul area while the other ensures the defensive line remains onside? And would they both have the power to blow their whistles to award penalties?
South African university Stellenbosch, where the most recent law changes were developed, came up with and trialled a two referee system. Unfortunately it was almost universally panned by referees as being unnecessary and taking away from referee’s individual styles of controlling a game.
Mark Lawrence is one referee who trialled it and spoke against it. “Willie Roos and I did the two-referee system on an annual basis for the Ermelo High School Alumni vs Impalas. Feelings were mixed. Some players felt it inhibiting and couldn’t give their all, and so they stuck to the law! While others felt it slowed the game down. The reason was that the penalty count was higher. Occasionally, Willie and I, simultaneously, awarded penalties in opposite directions. We then awarded a scrum to the team going forward,” he said.
And here lies the crux of the problem for rugby: A referee could blow his whistle for an infringement at just about every single breakdown but often uses his judgement to decide what materially affects the game and what doesn’t. If referees disagree on this, it completely undermines their credibility.
Lawrence also disliked having his own style encroached upon by working with another referee. “For me, refereeing is a skill, encompassing man management skills, and an art to be able to judge materiality and advantage. These are lost with two referees,” he said.
Heavensgame.com also took a look at this issue, speaking to USA Rugby’s National Panel Manager Richard Every who said he was in favour of using a second referee, but then identified a coaching issue for referees which could go a long way to solving the problem.
“What happens with a lot of referees – and we noticed it a lot in the Super 14 – was that they approached the breakdown square on so their shoulders are parallel to the touchlines. They’re either looking over their shoulder at the backlines or they turn towards them and look at them but they’ve got no perspective of where the offside lines are because of their positioning.
“How I try to coach our referees is that they approach the breakdown from a 45º angle so that their shoulders are North-South meaning they’re parallel to the goal lines so that they have the whole visual perspective of the tackle and which players are coming from which direction and they’ve got a clear visual of where the gate should be at the tackle. All you have to do is stand and look up and then move away from the tackle because you’ve ensured the ball is secured and then you’re looking at the backlines.”
Finally All Black assistant coach Wayne Smith had perhaps the simplest solution for referees: “It’s just like the players – get fitter.”


